|
First off, I completely understand why you are making this rule. Undoubtedly, it is coming from the sponsors who are paying the bills, and I understand that. I also agree that the full on nudity and see through clothing may not be appropriate for this setting.
Savvy, to me, is in the same catergory as the lad mags; Maxim, FHM, Loaded, Nuts, Zoo, Ralph, UMM to name a few. Their photographic philsophy seems to be it's okay to do implied nudity-hands covering breasts or vagina-it is what it is-as well as thong shots. To me, that-and the strategically covered suds-should be okay as long as no actual "privates" are showing. If that is your standard, then things should be okay. If your standards are more puritanical, I strongly feel that you run the risk of alienating the very people whom you are ostensibly trying to reach. Bottom line, I agree with you-up to a point, and am taking a wait and see approach to your actions.
|
sexy skin tones show thew as if they where nudes any way, sheers, bubbles, motor cycles, hot rods, all blocking covered parts do look hot lets just keep in mind Savvy Rock Us With A Free Site and its there rules we must fallow them
bubble gum any one just kidding no nude shots even if they are done right is OK with me Savvy you Rock
PUSH IT TO THE EXTREME LADES HARD CORE WITH OUT THE XXX
*************CARLOS I SURE HOPE NOT THAT'S SO SEXY TO ME*****************
As above some will say there is so many models that do not like the nude publications and don't like any part to do with them as well but to be baned over
fire arms, cigarettes, alcohol is pushing it we are not 16 unless that is what you are trying to bring in to the new sponsorship of Savvy
I all so feel that I am not uncomfortable about nudity any anyway other than wide
open shots and hard core porn
Playboy that is my magazi
I've been with SAVVY now since Xposed,they've come along way since then.
Keeping the content safe and viewable,even at work if one chooses
to.Savvy is doing great things content wise to better themselves.
I applaud everyone at Savvy "behind the scenes",
who makes Savvy a better site everyday.
You shouldn't have to get your kit off to have a shot at the million dollars.
x
I mean banning sheer clothing??? Come on!
I feel it is catering for a different market for both men and woman and will be successful with this new approach, hence why I joined.
Thanks,
J
Savvy, to me, is in the same catergory as the lad mags; Maxim, FHM, Loaded, Nuts, Zoo, Ralph, UMM to name a few. Their photographic philsophy seems to be it's okay to do implied nudity-hands covering breasts or vagina-it is what it is-as well as thong shots. To me, that-and the strategically covered suds-should be okay as long as no actual "privates" are showing. If that is your standard, then things should be okay. If your standards are more puritanical, I strongly feel that you run the risk of alienating the very people whom you are ostensibly trying to reach. Bottom line, I agree with you-up to a point, and am taking a wait and see approach to your actions.
Now, how about images that include bearing firearms, cigarettes, simulated "drinking" (alcohol), etc, etc ...
Is Savvy considering to delete this type of pictures as well ?